Minutes of Meeting: NISM/II
Collaborative Learning Discussion 2: Scanning Exercise
a. Need to post the practical and team activity from Unit 3 b. We have some results from individuals posted on Slack c. We can summarize all these results and post in Collaborative Discussion 2 as a team d. Yusuf agreed to summarize and post the results
Design Document Preparation
a. During the call, we have decided our Design document will base on the methodology of OWASP and then combine with the second methodology (to be decided from OSSTMM, NIST, PTES, and ISSAF) b. Review the website https://www.vumetric.com/blog/top-penetration-testing-methodologies/ and complete the evaluation of our assigned methodology. • OSSTMM - Yvone • NIST - Brandon • PTES - Tony • ISSAF - Yusuf
Next action
- Book a session with the tutor as a team (the schedule depends on our progress on 1.b Design Document Preparation)
- Submit the first assignment by week 6
Note
During the meeting, we have reviewed the requirements and criteria together regarding the first assignment Design Document
- We need to identify the appropriate governing body and associated regulations that apply to our assigned site
- Regarding the requirement “Create a list of possible security vulnerabilities”, we can refer to the checklist from OWASP’s open resource ( https://essexuniversity-my.sharepoint.com/:x:/r/personal/lt21751_essex_ac_uk/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B3F13AC7F-12AF-414F-9F4A-1390DA278755%7D&file=OWASPv4_Checklist.xlsx&action=default&mobileredirect=true)
Explore more like this
NISM Reflection
As technology advances further, so do security issues. There is a correlation between cybercrimes and the growth of technology (Utica University, n.d.). New technologies mean new touchpoints for cybercriminals to...
Evaluation of Assignment I & II
Doing the second assignment, where we started to get our hands to do the security audit, we found that it’s not easy to evaluate the site security without having the...
Comments